• Home
  • WHY
  • FIRE
  • allies
  • Solutions
  • Legislation
  • Research
  • RHNA
  • More
    • Home
    • WHY
    • FIRE
    • allies
    • Solutions
    • Legislation
    • Research
    • RHNA
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • WHY
  • FIRE
  • allies
  • Solutions
  • Legislation
  • Research
  • RHNA

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Why fight state housing policy?

It’s based on falsehoods

Mandates are so exaggerated they ensure failure

Mandates are so exaggerated they ensure failure

Declaring a “housing crisis at all levels" has allowed our state government to focus on market rate housing while ignoring the real needs of Californians -- homes regular people can afford. Our policy creates housing by  giving private for profit developers unimpeded rights in our communities to build out of scale  projects at market rate, by adding a small percentage of “affordable” units. 

Mandates are so exaggerated they ensure failure

Mandates are so exaggerated they ensure failure

Mandates are so exaggerated they ensure failure

Using an unsubstantiated claim that the California will grow by 7.5 million residents by 2031,  2.5 million units of new housing have been distributed statewide, one size fits all, requiring about 15% growth per city, regardless of circumstance. The California Department of Finance projects a stable population out to 2060. This is ignored. 

Control taken from cities, given to developers

Mandates are so exaggerated they ensure failure

Control taken from cities, given to developers

Blamed for lack of housing and high prices, cities have been stripped of the ability to control zoning and planning, regardless of whether this is true. Stewardship is out. Private industry, unfettered, is now the arbiter of how a city will grow. Hundreds of new laws give cities no leeway to use discretion and knowledge of local condition. 

Punishes cities into compliance

Ignores historic districts and community character

Control taken from cities, given to developers

Cities that don’t comply fast enough by upzoning every area for housing density, or not approving unwise developments quickly  can be sued, fined, and lose the last shreds of control they have left in planning for livability and safety. The state has a Housing Strike Force to carry these threats out, as if cities were criminals.

Prioritizes large market rate developments

Ignores historic districts and community character

Ignores historic districts and community character

Policy favors density, and the for-profit industry is rewarded with automatic approval of out of scale projects. Density bonuses, elimination of height, mass, and setback restrictions are just some of the perks offered. On-site parking requirements are eliminated, forcing cars to the street.

Ignores historic districts and community character

Ignores historic districts and community character

Ignores historic districts and community character

Aesthetics are out — too subjective. Only objective standards apply. Historic buildings can be replaced by faceless stack and pack monstrosities. Neighborhood character — the literal existing built environment — is derided as exclusionary. Developers are encouraged to break up long-standing communities carefully developed over time as if they have no value. 

Demonizes single family homes

Eliminates planning, impact studies, and community input

Eliminates planning, impact studies, and community input

Single family neighborhoods are legislated away, and towering developments can stand between homes. Instead of helping create ownership opportunities at affordable scale, existing single family homes are demonized as "racist," although people of all races want aceess to them. Homeownership is key for a better future for all people, but it’s going away — replaced by a permanent rental society. 


Eliminates planning, impact studies, and community input

Eliminates planning, impact studies, and community input

Eliminates planning, impact studies, and community input

Planning, impact studies, and our local democracy are at stake. State overreach  silences residents and their elected officials, who are often forced to approve terrible projects. Site poles have been eliminated, along with public noticing. You won’t know a project’s going up until construction begins. 

Policy erodes environmental controls

Eliminates planning, impact studies, and community input

Policy erodes environmental controls

Environmental studies are blamed as holding up progress. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which has safeguarded so much, is being eliminated. The Coastal Commission is blamed for lack of affordable housing along our fragile coastline, even though their ability to approve it ended in the 1980’s. If we don't fight, our beautiful coastal will turn into Miami Beach.

DENSITY BONUS LAW: why projects ARE SO big

DENSITY BONUS LAWS CAN MAKE A PROJECT HUGE

DENSITY BONUS LAWS CAN MAKE A PROJECT HUGE

DENSITY BONUS LAWS CAN MAKE A PROJECT HUGE

California's Density Bonus Law (Government Code §65915) requires cities to award additional units above their base zoning to any developer who includes a qualifying affordable set-aside. The bonus is calculated as a percentage of the base density:

• Setting aside 5% of base units as very-low income earns a 20% density bonus

• Setting aside 15% of base units as very-low income earns a 50% density bonus

• Setting aside 15% very-low income plus 15% moderate income (under AB 1287, effective 2024) earns a 100% density bonus — doubling the total project

• A 100% affordable project earns an 80% density bonus


DBL AND INCENTIVES / CONCESSIONS

DENSITY BONUS LAWS CAN MAKE A PROJECT HUGE

DENSITY BONUS LAWS CAN MAKE A PROJECT HUGE

• Enhanced Density & Height Limits (AB 1763/AB 2334) For projects that are 100% affordable to lower-income households, being within a half-mile of a major transit stop provides:

No Maximum Density Limits: Local governments cannot impose a density limit on these projects.

Increased Height: The project is entitled to a height increase of up to three stories or 33 feet. 

Elimination of Parking MinimumsFor projects within a half-mile of a major transit stop, the DBL provides special parking exemptions: 

Zero Parking Requirement: For 100% affordable rental projects (with specified exceptions), the city must allow no parking spaces if requested.

Reduced Parking: For mixed-income projects, the minimum requirement can be lowered to 0.5 spaces per unit. 

Increased Incentives and Concessions Projects that are 100% affordable to lower-income households within a half-mile of a major transit stop (or in a low VMT area) are eligible for: 

Up to Five Incentives/Concessions: These help developers override other development standards, such as set-backs or square footage requirements.

BONUSES DON’T APPLY TO AFFORDABLE UNITS

DENSITY BONUS LAWS CAN MAKE A PROJECT HUGE

BONUSES DON’T APPLY TO AFFORDABLE UNITS

The Bonus Units Are All Market-Rate

This is the critical mechanical point that has been almost completely absent from the policy conversation: the bonus units added by the density bonus law are entirely market-rate. The affordable set-aside is calculated as a percentage of the base density. The bonus units sit on top of that base. Not a single bonus unit is affordable.

SB 79 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

SB 79 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

BONUSES DON’T APPLY TO AFFORDABLE UNITS

SB 79: The New "Transit-Oriented Development" Act (Eff. 7/1/2026) 


SB 79 strengthens these rules by creating state-mandated minimum zoning standards within a half-mile of high-quality transit stops (e.g., BART, Caltrain, subway lines, major BRT lines): 

Density/Height Floor: Local governments cannot restrict density or height below specific thresholds.

Tier 1 Stations (0.25 mile): Up to 9 stories permitted (75 feet).

Tier 1 Stations (0.25 to 0.5 mile): Up to 6-7 stories permitted (65 feet).

Adjacency Bonuses: Projects within 200 feet of a transit station pedestrian access point may get an additional 20 feet of height and an additional 40 units per acre. 

Definition of "Major Transit Stop"To qualify for these benefits, the site must be within 0.5 miles of a: 

Existing rail or bus rapid transit station.

Ferry terminal served by bus or rail.

Intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during morning/afternoon peak commute periods. 

Note: The laws regarding density bonuses are updated frequently, with SB 79 officially shifting to a state-mandated, higher density requirement for these areas in mid-2026.

SENIOR DENSITY BONUSES

SB 79 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

SENIOR DENSITY BONUSES

California’s Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code §§65915–65918) provides developers with a 20% density increase for senior citizen housing projects (35+ units) to incentivize affordable, age-restricted development. These projects can receive concessions (e.g., reduced parking, height waivers) and, as of 2024, now include residential care facilities for the elderly. 

Qualification: Projects must meet senior housing definitions (typically 35+ units, age 62+ or 55+ in at least one unit).

Bonus Amount: Qualified senior projects are generally entitled to a 20% increase in density.

Types of Senior Projects: This applies to independent living, assisted living, and residential care facilities for the elderly.

Incentives & Concessions: Projects may receive reductions in development standards, such as fewer parking requirements or reduced setbacks, to make the project financially feasible.

Affordable Senior Units: If a senior project also provides units for lower-income households, it may qualify for higher, tiered density bonuses (up to 50% or higher, depending on the percentage of affordability).


MORE INFO

SB 79 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

SENIOR DENSITY BONUSES

For detailed information on implementing these, refer to the Association of Bay Area Governments' Density Bonus Model Program Guidelines or review the San Francisco Planning Department's Guidance on State Density Bonus Law. Limitations

Exclusion: The 20% senior bonus often cannot be combined with the bonus for lower-income households; however, developers can choose to apply the more beneficial affordable housing formula.

Local Compliance: Local governments cannot refuse to grant a density bonus if the statutory criteria are met, and they are required to allow for incentives, concessions, and waivers. 

For a broader, legal overview of the law, see the Meyers | Nave Guide to the California Density Bonus Law. 

your contribution matters

DONATE BY CLICKING HERE

Copyright © 2026 Wake Up California  - All Rights Reserved.

  • CONTACT

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept